LOOPER JGL INTERVIEW
LOOPER JGL INTERVIEW
In the futuristic action thriller Looper, from
writer/director Rian Johnson (Brick, The Brothers Bloom), the mob uses time
travel to get rid of someone by sending their target 30 years into the past
where a hired gun (known as a “looper”) is waiting to assassinate them. And
then, one day, a looper named Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) suddenly recognizes
one of his targets as his future self (played by Bruce Willis). The film also
stars Emily Blunt, Paul Dano, Piper Perabo and Jeff Daniels.
Prior to their panel presentation at WonderCon 2012, actor
Joseph Gordon-Levitt and filmmaker Rian Johnson met with press to talk about
why they enjoy working together, Check out what they had to say:
Bruce Willis & JGL play the Same Character |
Q: A lot of
times, it’s hard to find the audience for a film and get people interested
enough to go out and see it, but with this, people are clamoring just to see
the first possible footage. What does that feel like? How gratifying is that?
GORDON-LEVITT:
It’s nice. I love movies. I don’t just like them, I love them. So, to be
somewhere like WonderCon, amongst other people who feel that strongly as well,
is exciting.
JOHNSON: We were
talking about the push and pull of how much you tell and how much you hold
back. When I see a news story on a site, about a movie that I’m interested in,
it’s like the mouse going for the pleasure button and I click it. But then,
when I see the movie, it’s like, “Oh, I would have enjoyed the movie that much
more, if I hadn’t known that.” For me, this is the first time I’m working with
a movie where there is that thing of, “How much do we give away? How much do we
tease?” It’s an interesting process.
Q: So, what can
you tease about this movie?
JOHNSON: The
first big thing is how Joe plays a younger version of Bruce Willis, with the
prosthetic make-up on him. We slathered his face with uncomfortable gunk.
JGL: It took
almost three hours to apply the make-up. It’s a different face, and that was
obviously the foundation of the character. Well, that’s not true. The
foundation of the character was just Bruce [Willis], and studying him, watching
his movies and listening to his voice. For me, it was definitely one of the
more interesting challenges I’ve ever tackled, as an actor. I think I could
probably say that it’s my favorite performance of my own.
Q: Since the role
was written for Joe, how did you decide that Bruce Willis would be the right
actor to play the older version of the character?
JOHNSON: I had
already written it for Joe, and then we cast Bruce in it, and then we dealt
with, “Okay, how do we figure this out?” As our ingenious make-up designer
pointed out, they actually look very dissimilar. They don’t look alike, at all.
So, our approach was to pick a couple key features and alter those. When Joe
showed up on set and started shooting, I was still very, very nervous ‘cause we
had committed to this extreme make-up and it’s not like we had totally
transformed him, so that he looked like Bruce in Moonlighting, or something. It
was a hybrid. But, when Joe kicked in the performance, I knew that was going to
take it a long way. It was amazing how much of a transformation there was, once
Joe started doing the voice. The other thrilling thing about it, for me, was
that it wasn’t imitation. He created a character, but it was a character that
could be a young Bruce Willis. It was an amazing high-wire act that Joe was
pulling off, every day. For me, it was just really fun to watch.
Q: Did you and
Bruce Willis meet and talk about how you were going to play the same character?
JGL: I based my
character on him. I watched his movies, and I would take the audio out of his
movies and put it on my iPod, so I could listen to him. But, most of all, I just
got to hang out with him, have dinner, have conversations and get to know him.
It was a fascinating challenge because I didn’t want to do an impression of
him. First of all, I’m not a good impersonator. Second of all, I just didn’t
think that would be appropriate. It’s not a comedy. But, creating a character
that was more him than me was fascinating. Then, we had this special effects
makeup, every morning, for three hours, so my face is not my face. To look in
the mirror every day and see someone else’s face was a trip. It was sort of a
dream. As an actor, what I get off on most is becoming someone else.
JGL playing a young Bruce Willis |
Q: What did you
learn about Bruce as you were studying his work, and what was the biggest
challenge for you?
JGL: Bruce is
actually a very understated guy. It’s interesting because he’s such a large
personality that your first instinct is to try to be large. But, in fact, he
draws a lot of his power from stillness, and he actually speaks quietly. It
tricks you, at first, because you wouldn’t think that he speaks quietly because
his voice makes such a powerful impression. It took me a second to figure that
out. I do think that a lot of the closest moments that I got him were actually
the quieter, stiller moments.
Q: Was the plan
always to have two different actors for the older and younger versions of this
character?
JOHNSON:
Initially, when I cast Joe and we were talking about it before we had cast
Bruce, we were talking about the option of just doing make-up or something
else.
JGL: The
egotistical actor in me was like, “Let me do both!,” but I’m so glad that’s not
what we did.
JOHNSON: The
reason that I actually came down against it was twofold. First, I think with
aging make-up on younger actors, I don’t feel like I’ve ever seen it completely
work. There’s been some tremendous work that’s been done, but I feel like, if
you know what an actor looks like who’s young, as a movie-goer, I can usually
see right through it. The bigger thing for me, and what emotionally pulled me
into the movie, was the idea of a young man sitting across from an older man,
who’s himself. You can make someone up. Joe is a fantastic actor. But, there’s
something about a span of 25 years between two people that you can’t fake. That
just buys you something that’s intangible and very essential to what this movie
is basically about. And so, I thought it was really important to have two
actors actually sitting across from each other, with that age gap between them.
JGL: And there’s
no way that I could have delivered the character that Bruce did. Bruce is
magnificent in this movie. He gives a really strong performance. That’s not
something I could have done, at all.
Q: How would you
describe the universe of this film?
JOHNSON: Well,
it’s the near future and it’s very, very grounded. It is 30 years in the
future. It’s kind of dystopian. Everything has fallen apart a little bit. But,
it’s not as completely conceptualized as something like Blade Runner. It is a
little more grounded and a little more down-to-earth. The truth is that, even though
we had some fun with the futuristic elements, the movie is very action and
character driven. The world that it takes place in was less about making a very
distinct future world and more about these characters really driving us through
this thing. It was more about, “What’s a world that we can pull off on our
budget that looks real and makes sense, as a future?”
Q: With time
travel comes rules. Did you start from scratch to create your own idea of how
time travel works, or were you influenced by other methods?
JOHNSON: The
biggest influence, in terms of how to handle it from a storytelling point of
view, was the first Terminator movie. I loved that film, for so many reasons.
The genius thing about how it uses time travel was how it set up the premise and
then got out of the way, so you’re not spending the whole movie explaining
things on chalkboards. I also love time travel movies that do that. Primer is
one of my favorite films. But, for this specifically, it’s really the
characters and the action that drives it through. For me, it was about, “How do
we use time travel without making the audience think about time travel, the
entire time?”
JGL in Looper as Bruce Willis |
Q: Have you
thought about this film as a franchise or possible sequels, or are you just
focusing on this film?
JOHNSON: I don’t
think about it. I don’t think in those terms. Storytelling wise, you’ve gotta
take it as far as you can possibly take it with each individual movie. If
you’re holding out something for a sequel or some cliff-hanger, that’s not how
I think of a satisfying story.
JGL: It’s a very
complete story. Rian doesn’t write stuff with money in mind. It’s not that kind
of process.
Q: Could you see
the character continuing to grow, in additional stories?
JOHNSON: I’d be
curious to hear your answer to that, once you see the film.
Great info! I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have. tree pruner
ReplyDelete